Saturday, April 5, 2025
No menu items!
No menu items!

Coffee aficionados vs. Starbucks in California

-Top Ads -

Coffee aficionados

In a brewing legal battle that has Californians buzzing, a trio of coffee aficionados has taken on java giant Starbucks, alleging discrimination against lactose-intolerant customers.

Maria Bolliger, Dawn Miller, and Shunda Smith are leading the charge, claiming that Starbucks’ milk surcharges for non-dairy options are a violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).

The lawsuit sheds light on the hefty price lactose-intolerant patrons pay for their coffee fix. With alternatives like oat, almond, coconut, and soy milk tacking on up to an additional 90 cents per cup, the plaintiffs argue that Starbucks unfairly inflates prices for those seeking dairy-free options, despite comparable costs.

Ad Unit One -Ad script goes here

For Bolliger, Miller, and Smith, it’s not just about the extra pocket change—it’s a matter of principle. Substituting 2% milk for a lactose-free alternative can hike up their bills by anywhere from 50 to 80 cents per order.

Coffee aficionados to court

Behind the scenes, the lawsuit points fingers at Starbucks’ pricing strategies, highlighting the stark difference in cost between traditional dairy and non-dairy options. While dairy products hover between 3 and 32 cents per fluid ounce, alternatives like soy, coconut, almond, and oat milk range from 4 to 7 cents per ounce.

Ad Unit 2 -Ad Unit two

With Starbucks reportedly raking in over $1 billion in the United States from these alleged discriminatory practices, the lawsuit aims to bring justice not just to California, but to lactose-intolerant coffee drinkers nationwide.

Keith Gibson, one of the attorneys representing the plaintiffs, stated that Starbucks’ decision to offer non-dairy alternatives but impose surcharges amounts to discrimination against those with dietary restrictions. He emphasized that for many, the choice is not a matter of preference but a necessity dictated by their inability to consume regular dairy.

As the legal caffeine kicks in, all eyes are on Starbucks as this case percolates through the courts, stirring up discussions about inclusivity and corporate responsibility in the coffee industry.

Cover Photo: Depositphotos

Read More News

Former President Trump calls out Biden’s falsehoods on immigration plan

The post Coffee aficionados vs. Starbucks in California appeared first on The Independent News.

- Below Post -Bootom of post

Hot this week

Sharon Osbourne regrets dramatic weight loss

Television personality Sharon Osbourne appeared on Piers Morgan’s show...

Brain Implant: Elon Musk’s Neuralink venture now ready for human trials

After controversial tests on monkeys, Elon Musk’s groundbreaking company,...

X users defending Emma Roberts over statement from Angelica Ross claiming she is transphobic 

The topic of transphobia is one of the utmost...

Ryeoun and Ha Yoo Joon’s tension boils over in ‘Namib’

KOREA: As reported by Soompi, Ryeoun faces a pivotal...

Blossoms and lanterns in Chinese New Year celebration at Gardens by the Bay

SINGAPORE: In late January, Singapore’s Gardens by the Bay...

‘Someone Cute’ — NMIXX’s Haewon teased for naming Byeon Woo Seok as her ideal type

KOREA: As reported by PINKVILLA, NMIXX's Haewon recently shared...

Man says new electric bus is uncomfortable, not senior-friendly

SINGAPORE: A man took to social media to express...

Would you live in a ground-floor unit in front of a car park? Residents weigh pros and cons

SINGAPORE: Singaporean residents weighed the pros and cons of...

Obesity prevalence: Singapore ranks 3rd in Southeast Asia

SINGAPORE: A recent infographic published by Seasia Stats shows...
spot_img
Add custom code here

Related Articles

Popular Categories

spot_imgspot_img