Friday, April 4, 2025
No menu items!
No menu items!

$1.7 trillion spending bill unconstitutional, says Judge Hendrix

-Top Ads -

Hendrix

U.S. District Judge James Wesley Hendrix, a federal judge in Texas, has declared the $1.7 trillion government funding bill, passed in 2022, unconstitutional due to lawmakers resorting to proxy voting instead of in-person participation.

Judge Hendrix, appointed by former President Donald Trump, issued a memorandum opinion and order on Feb. 27, asserting that the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2023, the largest spending package in U.S. history, was passed in violation of the Constitution’s Quorum Clause.

Proxy voting

The lawsuit, brought forth by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton against the Biden administration, argued that the use of proxy voting undermined the integrity of the legislative process. Despite the Biden administration’s contention that the court lacked jurisdiction, Judge James Wesley Hendrix maintained that the court’s role was to uphold constitutional principles, not to question vote counts.

Ad Unit One -Ad script goes here

Judge Hendrix highlighted that the inclusion of absent members in the quorum count rendered the act unconstitutional, mandating a reassessment of the legislative process.

The proxy voting rule, initially implemented in May 2020 under the stewardship of then-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi amid the COVID-19 pandemic, allowed representatives to act as proxies for absent colleagues during floor votes.

Ad Unit 2 -Ad Unit two

Despite earlier legal challenges, the Supreme Court’s refusal to hear a case brought by then-House Speaker Kevin McCarthy in January 2023, and subsequent extensions of the rule, the issue persisted. Paxton’s lawsuit further scrutinized the constitutionality of the $1.7 trillion spending bill, underscoring concerns over specific provisions impacting Texas.

The ruling

Judge Hendrix’s ruling, while acknowledging the unconstitutionality of the proxy voting rule, maintained a limited scope, refraining from nullifying the entire spending bill.

In a final judgment on Feb. 28, Judge Hendrix dismissed other claims against the Biden administration, citing a lack of standing, while upholding the constitutionality of the majority of the spending bill.

Reacting to the ruling, Paxton criticized Congress for its use of proxy voting and urged adherence to constitutional norms, emphasizing the paramount importance of upholding the rule of law.

Cover Photo: Depositphotos

Read More News

Conservatives concerned after liberals show support for Emonte Morgan who unalived a cop

The post $1.7 trillion spending bill unconstitutional, says Judge Hendrix appeared first on The Independent News.

- Below Post -Bootom of post

Hot this week

Sharon Osbourne regrets dramatic weight loss

Television personality Sharon Osbourne appeared on Piers Morgan’s show...

Brain Implant: Elon Musk’s Neuralink venture now ready for human trials

After controversial tests on monkeys, Elon Musk’s groundbreaking company,...

X users defending Emma Roberts over statement from Angelica Ross claiming she is transphobic 

The topic of transphobia is one of the utmost...

Ryeoun and Ha Yoo Joon’s tension boils over in ‘Namib’

KOREA: As reported by Soompi, Ryeoun faces a pivotal...

Blossoms and lanterns in Chinese New Year celebration at Gardens by the Bay

SINGAPORE: In late January, Singapore’s Gardens by the Bay...

‘Someone Cute’ — NMIXX’s Haewon teased for naming Byeon Woo Seok as her ideal type

KOREA: As reported by PINKVILLA, NMIXX's Haewon recently shared...

Man says new electric bus is uncomfortable, not senior-friendly

SINGAPORE: A man took to social media to express...

Would you live in a ground-floor unit in front of a car park? Residents weigh pros and cons

SINGAPORE: Singaporean residents weighed the pros and cons of...

Obesity prevalence: Singapore ranks 3rd in Southeast Asia

SINGAPORE: A recent infographic published by Seasia Stats shows...
spot_img
Add custom code here

Related Articles

Popular Categories

spot_imgspot_img